Pick
Canon R6 II
Better rolling shutter control, stronger IBIS, great for fast action video.
TL;DR picks
Runner-up
Sony A7 IV
Huge lens ecosystem, excellent color and AF for hybrid shooters.
Budget
Used A7 III
Cheaper full-frame option; less video spec but solid photo AF.
Quick comparison
| Category | Sony A7 IV | Canon R6 II |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Hybrid, lens flexibility | Hybrid/action, better rolling shutter |
| Video | 4K30 oversampled; 4K60 crop, rolling shutter in 24/30 | 4K60 oversampled, cleaner motion |
| IBIS | Good with Active (crop) | Stronger IBIS for handheld |
| AF | Great subject variety | Excellent human/animal tracking |
| Thermals | Good for interviews, watch long 4K | Improved heat handling |
| Lenses | Massive E-mount choice | RF lenses pricier, fewer third-party |
Scores
Key differences
Autofocus
Both excellent; Canon is slightly stickier for humans, Sony stronger for varied subjects.
Video limits
A7 IV has rolling shutter in 4K24/30; R6 II handles motion better and has 4K60 oversampled.
Stabilization
R6 II IBIS is stronger for handheld video; Sony Active mode crops but is usable.
Choose Sony A7 IV if…
You want the E-mount lens ecosystem, strong color, and reliable AF for hybrid work, and your video is mostly talking heads or controlled motion.
Choose Canon R6 II if…
You shoot fast-moving subjects or gimbal-free video and want better rolling-shutter performance plus stronger IBIS. Budget for RF lenses or adapted glass.
Bottom line
A7 IV wins for lens variety and color tools; R6 II wins for video motion handling and IBIS. Pick the body that matches your subjects and the lenses you want to own.
Affiliate note
This page may contain affiliate links. If you buy through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.