Canon R6 III
Cleaner rolling shutter, stronger IBIS, great AF for action and handheld video.
Flagship hybrid showdown: AF, rolling shutter, stabilization, codecs, and real-world heat.
Cleaner rolling shutter, stronger IBIS, great AF for action and handheld video.
Massive lens ecosystem, flexible color tools, improved thermals and AF variety.
Still excellent hybrids if you don’t need the latest codecs and rolling shutter gains.
| Category | Sony A7 V | Canon R6 III |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Hybrid, lens flexibility | Hybrid/action, handheld video |
| Video | 4K60 HQ, 10-bit, better rolling shutter than A7 IV | 4K60 oversampled, strong motion handling |
| Stabilization | IBIS + Active (crop) | IBIS stronger for handheld |
| AF | Great subject variety, improved tracking | Excellent human/animal tracking |
| Thermals | Improved heat handling | Solid for long takes |
| Lenses | Huge E-mount options | RF lenses pricier, fewer third-party |
Both excellent; Canon is stickier for humans/animals. Sony strong across varied subjects and lenses.
A7 V improves over A7 IV but R6 III remains cleaner for fast motion and pans.
R6 III IBIS better for handheld video; Sony Active helps but crops.
Both improved; Canon still reliable for longer 4K sessions. Sony better than older A7 IV.
Sony: massive third-party and native options. Canon RF: great glass but pricier, fewer third-party AF choices.
You want the deepest lens ecosystem, flexible color options, and improved thermals over A7 IV. Ideal for hybrid shooters who mix talking heads, events, and photo work.
You shoot fast-moving subjects, need strong IBIS for handheld video, and want cleaner rolling shutter. Great for weddings, documentary, and action hybrids.
A7 V wins on lenses and flexibility; R6 III wins on motion handling and IBIS. Pick based on your subjects and whether you want lens variety or the cleanest handheld video.
This page may contain affiliate links. If you buy through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.